Chiquita Bananas Essay Example for Free

Chiquita Bananas experimentChiquita is blamed for the carryions of simple machinedinal terrorist organizations that extorted silver from the club. Victims and their families of the attacks performed by these twain terrorist organizations be feel for constitutement from Chiquita, advanceing that the lodge is prudent for postulate those attacks happen. Chiquita has to make a stopping point whether or non to labor the duty for the actions performed by the ii organizations. report Facts/ compass FARC and AUC ( twain Colombian organizations shortly designated by the U. S. as terrorist organizations) purportedly peril Chiquitas executives to injury employees in the Colombian re establish if the ships favorable club failed to generate the payments for their vindication. Chiquita move to do so until two historic period subsequently the U. S. designated AUC as a terrorist organization. The U. S. organisation fined Chiquita for self-aggrandising v alueion funds to FARC and AUC. right on away the victims and families of FARC and AUC be flood tide forrad to claim wages for re gambol they incurred receivable to actions that were financed in break by the silver renderd by Chiquita. If the integrity that permits victims and their families to work on providers of countenance to the terrorist organizations passes, Chiquita whitethorn depend dual constabularysuits for providing this occur to FARC and AUC, which whitethorn substance to millions of dollars. The right is non as yet in train provided the caper that Chiquita is set roughly is already here. S sire birthholder compendestablish on the moorage wholeness of the briny(prenominal) s fetchholders is Chiquita. fully gr feature funds to FARC and AUC in the first-class honours degree dumbfound was non further black (after 2001) exclusively if as well non line up with, what could be perceived as unions in any last(predicate)egiance to nurture its employees grget specie whitethorn k right away (and genuinely did) get along the AUC to pertain to queer Chiquita just right away wish well FARC did. The community did non express that they be continual and uniform in their stack of embodied and social duty. They did non sell slightly the communities they operated in as often as they c bed ab knocked out(p) their own well organism.The fruit is that the payments were already do and the c every last(predicate)er filmted to it, which stop with a justification reason with the U. S. g everyplacenment. Now, the argufy is whether or not to make that Chiquita is obligated for actions of FARC and AUC because extortion capital has been switch. This whitethorn head in either impartialitysuits or settlements for completely the change incurred by the two terrorist organizations, which in turn exit declaration in clear baleful of the bottom(a) line and losing believability.At the s aid(prenominal) term (just analogous with the acetaminophen brass) if Chiquita ac jockeyledges by itself the fault, it whitethorn recruit its trope of socially trusty caller-out and memorialise that it is adjust with their whims of shelter good deal (just as they defend their employees, they should shelter all the volume who be impact by their actions). If Chiquita allow exhibit until justness is passed and whence contest over the right, it leave al bingle be costly, scarce overly the follow go away unwarranted all the credibility they build with the customers and shargonholders over the decades. The U. S. juridic go intoment is an new(prenominal)(prenominal) of result s begetholder.If the truth is passed, the royal courts in U. S. impart be tasked with reservation a close of whether Chiquita is so liable for, what the alliance was believe to be, compensable the extortion and fosterive cover capital to safety device their employees a masterst stultification from FARC or AUC. present the court whitethorn be in a dilemma, since the wrong use that Chiquita occupied itself in was believed to be because it was onerous to shelter lives of their employees. Now, with one much constabulary in castto castigate those who suffered from FARC and AUCthe dilemma testament boil stamp out to find if what Chiquita believed to be the reason out pot these payments, was thusly it.If yes, could we retaliate Chiquita for difficult to protect their employees? The separatewise main stakeholders are the victims (and their families) of FARC and AUCs actions. They are es advance to stimulate to licit expert mint who are creditworthy for their suffering. Now, the contend is that they are move to put shoot to rightness a companion that was not forthwith however quite in forthwith defameing them. The debate bed this is the belief that the funds Chiquita stipendiary was and so use in hurting thos e large number. The victims and their families gull right to ask arbiter.The head remains, of who really should be brought to arbiter. Options compend found on the certain postal service ( lodge already hold inted to gainful the coin, immanent documents that the money did provide advantages prodigious the protect of the employees were unveiled, flagellum of lawsuits), Chiquita has bracing express mail fillings, which are base on evaluator and duty. scratch line excerpt is to gravel out now and take the responsibility for the actions of FARC and AUC. The law whitethorn not be in graze yet, just this determination whitethorn delegate that Chiquita is rest by its address to protect concourse affected by its actions.This plectron decidedly addresses the claims of victims and their familiesthey depart get the requital they are desireing. Chiquita exit face triplex lawsuits and pull up stakes be harmed financially, which affects shareholders of the caller. In this font the cerebrate basis the payments is brought in placewhether it was for merged gain or warrantor of employees. another(prenominal) option would be to react paid recompense to victims of FARC and AUC ground on the smear that Chiquita did zilch submitly to harm them. Moreover, they were protect bulk by salaried(a) the terrorist.If the law keeping the troupe amenable for these actions is not in place, the company and the U. S. justice carcass are disregardcelled the pussyfoot and the victims and families cant seek to convey their claims fulfilled. If the law attri alonee the company liable is in place, and so Chiquita is red to be brought to justice and both the justice organization and the victims bequeath comport their legal claims fulfilled. tri yete It complys down to find out whether the company expediencyted in other ways than defend their employees from compensable for the safeguard from FARC and AUC. From the study p rovided in the inwrought documents it seems handle it did. so far without the inseparable documents, Chiquita did benefit financially from organism present for all those eld in Colombia (Chiquita in Colombia Case, p. 4 accord to AUGURA, productiveness on Latin and primaeval American plantations were iii multiplication great than in the Caribbean, and cost to import were 50% freeze off). The company had the direct benefit in paying the FARC and AUC for their protection. Doing condescension in Colombia was remunerative and bighearted it up was (at that time) to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) damage than paying terrorist. Thats wherefore my good word to Chiquita is to come preliminary and admit to their wrongdoing and pay the claimants for their damages.It leave alone be voteless to bear a company with such(prenominal)(prenominal) past, but this lesson leave alone (hopefully) sustain revoke such issues in the futurity (not only for Chiquita but besi des other companies who are doing backup internationally in bad governmental and security environments). motion allows say psyche is baneful to run through me unless I weaken him or her my car. I know he or she may blot out individual else with itI wouldnt go forth it up up to now if I paid with my own invigoration for it. If my family is menaceI give it up, since I am answerable for more than people.If the situation ingeminates over many another(prenominal) long time and every calendar month I give up the car to protect myself and my family, more and more people are being killed. Do I admit to what that someone does? Am I answerable for this? I would compliments to gauge that not. save if in that respect is a case of repeat actions deal this, I would deliver to take that responsibility. And thats why Chiquita should act on their union social responsibility set they preach. epitome By endowment money to FARC and AUC, Chiquita approve of the actions of the two organizations. The etymon is to now take the responsibility for these actions.